The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
GG-1000x50

Who might need - and get - a pardon?

Legal advisers, high-level officials, covert operatives
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  August 17, 2006

060818_coverts_main
To date, there are at least 600 covert operatives who may find themselves in need of a pardon
Abuse of prisoners and detainees by US personnel has occurred, at the very least, at three overseas sites: Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad, in Iraq; Guantánamo Bay, in Cuba; and Bagram Air Base, in Afghanistan. As of April, more than 330 cases have surfaced in which US military and civilian personnel are alleged to have abused, tortured, or killed detainees, implicating more than 600 US personnel and involving more than 460 detainees.

We still do not know how widespread, severe, and systemic the abuse was. Thanks to the Washington Post’s Dana Priest’s pioneering reporting, the public learned last November that the US government is operating a “covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago that at various times has included sites in eight countries, including Thailand, Afghanistan and several democracies in Eastern Europe.” But what exactly has transpired at these sites remains unclear. Nor do we know what transpired during the first few years at Guantánamo Bay, since US officials wouldn’t let lawyers or human-rights advocates survey the facility until 2004 — more than two years after the detention facility opened — after the Supreme Court ruled that inmates have the right to receive visits from their lawyers.

So far, only lower-echelon military personnel and one civilian contractor have been charged with abuse-related offenses, all committed at Abu Ghraib. Yet federal prosecutors have numerous resources at their disposal to uncover what happened, and to work their way up the ladder toward prosecution of any of the president’s men responsible for allowing the military and intelligence services to step outside the traditional laws of war.

Related: Republican dirty tricks, Criminalizing the war, Resolution of the Maine Democratic State Committee, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Politics, Criminal Sentencing and Punishment, Prisons,  More more >
| More
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 12/21 ]   "A Very Merry Lifmus"  @ Church of Boston
[ 12/21 ]   The Buttcracker  @ Midway Café
[ 12/21 ]   Usher + Trey Songz  @ TD Garden
ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT QUASHES CASH-FOR-TESTIMONY  |  October 06, 2010
    The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts made a pronouncement last week that, to rational citizens, should be obvious: it's a bad idea for the state to be complicit in a scheme to pay criminal trial witnesses for their testimony — and for those witnesses to receive a bonus if the defendant is convicted.
  •   THE FBI'S SPY PROBLEM  |  July 07, 2010
    I've been following the latest Russian spy saga with great interest, partly because of the local color and partly because of my prior experience with the FBI.
  •   2010 MUZZLE AWARDS ON CAMPUS  |  June 30, 2010
    Harvard and Yale universities felt the sting of the global economic collapse firsthand in 2009, as the endowments of these stalwart New England Ivy League members dropped by nearly a third. The schools didn’t fare much better in the free marketplace of ideas, either.
  •   WILL BEACON HILL BE BULLIED INTO ENACTING A POLITICALLY CORRECT LAW?  |  April 12, 2010
    A case of high-school bullying in South Hadley ended in tragedy this past January when the alleged victim, a freshman girl, committed suicide. Now, ramped up by the outrage over the case, Massachusetts legislators are in danger of enacting a politically correct law that could have devastating effects on our free speech.
  •   FREE SPEECH FOR ME, BUT NOT FOR THEE  |  January 29, 2010
    Last Thursday's Supreme Court opinion striking down corporate campaign advertising restrictions might as well have been divorce papers in the rocky marriage between the political left and the First Amendment.

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group