The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
BMPCONCERT_2009_after_2

Sex, Drugs, Rock and Peace

How Abbie Hoffman politicized Woodstock – and changed America
By AL GIORDANO  |  July 22, 2009

Woodstock_Abbie_hoffman
 Abbie Hoffman

This article originally appeared in the July 29th, 1994 issue of the Boston Phoenix

Defense attorney Leonard Weinglass: Will you please identify yourself for the record.

Abbie Hoffman: My name is Abbie. I am an orphan of America.

Weinglass: Where do you reside?

Abbie: I live in Woodstock Nation.

Weinglass: Will you tell the court and jury where it is?

Abbie: Yes. It is a nation of alienated young people. We carry it around with us as a state of mind in the same way the Sioux Indians carried the Sioux nation around with them. It's a nation dedicated to cooperation versus competition, to the idea that people should have a better means of exchange than property and money, that there should be some other basis for human interaction. It is a nation dedicated to –

Judge Julius Hoffman: Just where it is, that is all.

Abbie: It is in my mind and in the minds of my brothers and sisters. It does not consist of property or material but, rather, of ideas and values...

Judge: No, we want the place of residence, if he has one. Place of doing business, if you have a business. Nothing about philosophy or India, sir. Just where do you live. Now, you said Woodstock. In what state is Woodstock?

Abbie: It is the state of mind, in the mind of myself and my brothers and sisters.

Thus began Abbie Hoffman's testimony in the trail of the Chicago Seven, in which he was charge with conspiracy to riot at the previous year's Democratic National Convention. It was only weeks after the Woodstock Music and Arts Festival, in upstate New York, but already the battle to define Woodstock was under way.

READ: Woodsock rock schlock. By Ken Emerson
 
How much rock would a Woodstock stock if. By Eleanor Weber
 
Interview: Michael Lang. By Rob Turbovsky

Twenty-five years later, the struggle to interpret and claim the legacy of what promoters billed as "Three Days of Peace and Music" is still raging.

Woodstock II, the 25th-anniversary event, organized by the same promoters who sponsored the first festival, is under fire for selling out the myth. Tickets are $135 for two days. The audience will not be allowed to bring food, but instead will have to purchase scrip in order to eat, drink, or buy corporate-sponsored souvenirs. Police will be on hand to make sure there is no overt use of marijuana or LSD. All of this is in stark contrast to everything that made the original festival significant. Admission to that three-day event was $18 and most got in for free.

Recent press reports on Woodstock II have used terms like "Woodshlock," "Greedstock," "Lollapawoodstock," and "Woodstock 90210" to describe the money-making thrust of the nostalgia machine. And whereas the first Woodstock was symbolized by a cute little dove on a guitar, T-shirts with a vulture replacing the bird of peace have recently been spotted in upstate New York. Another T-shirt, featuring images of barbed wire reads WOODSTOCK – OCCUPIED TERRITORY.

But even the original Woodstock was conceived as a commercial venture. Not unlike the situation today, the promoters and the corporate giant Warner Brothers hoped the 1969 festival would turn a handsome profit. How did it come to pass that one moment of a quarter-century ago would be transformed into a mythic event that continues to generate raging political debate?

Woodstock symbolizes, to some, a generation's discontent, opposition to the Vietnam War, sexual liberation, peace between races, mind expansion through hallucinogenic drugs, the evolution of the species, and, above all, the right of Americans to be free, to be different from the majority. For others, it has come to symbolize a dangerous sand promiscuous society, an orgy of law-breaking, the destruction of the nuclear family, a Biblical fall from the established order.

Each of those views acknowledges the same truth: Woodstock was – and is – political. And that did not happen by accident. It happened because a small group of dedicated political activists organized – before, during, and after the concert – to force a political imprint on the myth surrounding the event.

This is their story.

The Summer of '69

"In the summer of '69," recalls journalist Andrew Kopkind, now the associate editor of the Nation, "a part of the student movement had fixed on alienated, rebellious, young, white, student-age people as the spear of the nation."

This was the time, Kopkind says, when the Weathermen, then in their "anarcho-Yippie phase" would run through high-school corridors yelling, "Jailbreak!" The Weathermen, of course, later mutated into the Weather Underground, a revolutionary group with a penchant for planting bombs.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: Interview: Michael Lang, Chicago 10, Voice of regeneration, More more >
  Topics: Flashbacks , Media, Bob Dylan, John Sinclair,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY AL GIORDANO
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SEX, DRUGS, ROCK AND PEACE  |  July 22, 2009
    How Abbie Hoffman politicized Woodstock – and changed America
  •   DAMN YOU, BARACK OBAMA  |  September 26, 2007
    Win or lose, Obama's small donors may have already brought a revolution in campaign financing

 See all articles by: AL GIORDANO

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group