The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page

Artists get the shaft

By TED SIEFER  |  February 2, 2009

Shen, of the BRA, says that the letters shouldn't be interpreted to mean that the artists will be out on the street at the end of next month, but at the same time he underscores the urgency of getting the artists out of buildings for which Archon has no immediate plans. "People really don't have other options in the building," says Shen. "The fire marshal wants it vacated as soon as possible."

Is that a smoke screen? In citing fire safety, Shen echoes claims made by Archon: that there is no way of making necessary modifications as long as there is one soul in the building. Tenants refute this, saying fire alarms were installed after a protracted fight between inspectors and Archon, during which a fireman had to be stationed outside the building for several months, until the spring of 2008, presumably to alert the department in the event of a fire. There is no record of 337 Summer Street currently being in violation of the fire code, according to files kept by the Inspectional Services Department (ISD). Neither the Boston Fire Department nor ISD responded to repeated queries about the building.

Despite the confusion and concern raised by the BRA's plan and Archon's letters, Shen insists work should be getting underway any day now on the temporary studios, saying, "We think we're going to immediately jump-start construction work."

090130_ftpoint319_main
BAIT AND SWITCH: Rather than move temporarily from one building (337 A Street, bottom) to another (319 A Street, top), with the potential for another move looming in two years, many Fort Point artists have packed up and left the neighborhood for good.
State of the arts
In defending Boston's commitment to artists, city officials point to efforts it has made citywide, through its Artist Space Initiative, begun eight years ago to create units "permanently dedicated" to artists. The BRA estimates it has created around 200 units since the program began, many of them cobbled on as the affordable units in market-rate projects.

The program's proudest moment came with the opening of Midway Studios in Fort Point, an 89-unit rental building on Midway Street completed in 2005, which many artists acknowledge was the rare case when the city was able to prevail upon a developer to give up a building, or at least provide a 50-year lease. Artist space-advocacy groups have pushed for projects like Midway — large artist-only buildings owned or controlled by nonprofits or co-ops — around the country. In fact, 249 A Street in Fort Point, which has been owned by artists since 1983, has served as a national model.

The city, however, has shown a clear preference to work with private developers in creating artist units. When it comes to the tensions in Fort Point, the city has lately pointed to the Westinghouse project in Hyde Park (where, Menino's spokeswoman points out, our arts-loving mayor lives). The complex is being converted by a private developer into 62 artist live/work condos.

The project is ambitious, not least because condos aren't exactly selling like hotcakes these days — and artists may have as hard a time as anyone getting financing. At the same time, when the city zoning board approved the project in 2007, at the urging of the BRA, it agreed that the units could be sold to non-artists if, after a "good-faith marketing effort," units remained unsold. A similar policy prevails at other buildings, including ArtBlock, in the South End, where at least two artist units have gone to non-artists.

In any case, critics point out, the number of units created citywide does not equal the number of units that have been lost in Fort Point alone over the past decade. And if the city can't protect artists from being bullied around by an out-of-town corporate developer, in the very neighborhood proclaimed to be New England's "largest and oldest" artist community, what does it say about the effectiveness of its efforts?

"Boston is in trouble," said Bernstein of FPAC during a dusk-time stroll through Fort Point, as office workers hurriedly made their way down Summer Street to parking lots and over the bridge into downtown. "So much of the planning here has been market driven and piecemeal."

For him, the changes in Fort Point have been personally disillusioning. "I remember coming out here and being intimidated, because this was where the real artists were," recalls Bernstein of his art-student days at the Museum School in the early '90s. The neighborhood, he says, has since lost its mystique.

"An artist visiting from New York asked me, 'Where's Boston's Brooklyn?'" he recalls. "I said, 'We don't have one.' "

Ted Siefer is a Boston-based journalist. He can be reached at tedsiefer@me.com.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  | 
Related: Can Sam Yoon win?, City Hall writes its own report card, Edifice complex, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Fort Point, mayor, Ray Flynn,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Re: Artists get the shaft
Why are Artists getting the shaft? I don't understand that headline. I have been working in Boston for the past 23 years, traveling up and down Summer street, A street, Congress street and Mulcher street.I have not seen any improvement by any artist in that area for the entire time in my daily travel up and down streets which have run down warehouses. If Artitsts want a community to work and live at, they should have a better impact to thier community by stimulating their enviroment. For instance, at the corner of Mulcher street and A street.This week I noticed a new painting on an old diner, it's very cool to look at when I drive by(Not done by a Fort Point Artist). I see drawings on the sidewalk in Boston ( International place, Congress street couthouse). If the Artits think they are getting the shaft, and want help from others for thier cause, lets see what you have. Just because they have been at one location does not entitle them for squatters rights. Maybe a development company has ideas for condo's,retail space and restaurants for the area they do not want to vacate, thus stimulating the enviroment. Maybe I will not have to travel the same streets to see no change, with the exception of one painting every 23 years.  
By Patrowolf on 01/29/2009 at 4:53:15
Re: Artists get the shaft
This really is a shamefully unbalanced piece of journalism. At least try to get the facts straight and give the city some credit for all it's done to help preserve the fort point district. The mayor just finalized the creation of the fort point landmarks district, which does more to protect the physical character and fabric of the fort point community than anything the artist community has done without city help. Plus, the assertion that artists never had a seat at the table with the city is outrageous - most of the panel that came up with the landmarks district was composed of artists, with only one developer - the artists got their way all the way, and the mayor supported the landmarking -- some criticism of the goldman folks from NYC is fine but please present both sides of the story in terms of what the city did!!
By Southiewontgo on 01/29/2009 at 7:47:50
Re: Artists get the shaft
Whoever wrote the first comment is a f-ing idiot.  First - most artists in the area are not public-art artists.  Second - the buildings (including the old A Street Diner that you are referring to) are owned and need $$$$ to make public work on - that is why the work by Shepard Fairey is installed there now - completely and 100 percent backed by the ICA.  So please, shut up until you know what you are talking about.  
By artistinresidence on 01/29/2009 at 7:59:54
Re: Artists get the shaft
@ Patrowolf.

You dont understand the headline? Maybe if you would have read the entire article you would have more of a sense of whats going on in the neighborhood. I will also point out, that if you ever got out of your car instead of driving through you would have more of an understanding of the community as well. There have been many artists that have taken great steps to improve the neighborhood. Local artist Ana Crowley owns the Channel Cafe, which is a great spot to eat and a very positive addition to the neighborhood.
There have been artist co-ops that have bought buildings to solidify the space for their work.
The point of this article is that the developers basically either lied about their plans, or abondoned them, both of which were at the expense of an ongoing community. The area is billed as New Englands Largest Artists Community, so its obvioulsy something the city points out or flaunts this for its own best interest, that being said, they should def be held accountable to help protect these tenants from seedy out-of-town investors. BTW, The artists DO have squatting rights, its Mass., so check your laws...But it should not come to that though, not when  promises were made and then broken.
The BRA has done too little too late. If not for the pressure applied by local artists to the mayors office, they would be working(and pretty much are) for the best interests of the developers.The so-called relocation of the Fort Point Artists is a joke, I was in Fort Point and left because of the games that Archon was playing. They are trying to make it as difficult as possible for any artist to feel comfortable staying there right now, even though they supposedly offered two year leases. I have read article after article on this situation and in the end, the Mayors office has done little to regulate the terms and conditions that Archon has supposedly set. The BRA is a joke without a punchline. Its so obvious that its in shambles and the people in charge dont know enough about the communites that they are supposed to support. How long has Kairos Shen had this job? Not very long..thats for sure. It's not his fault, but he's in WAY over his head, and all that adds up to is the artists getting screwed.

Anyway, patrowolf, if you had ever got out of your car, you would have seen multiple art shows a year, open studios, street art sponsored by grants from the city, street art that wasnt sponsored by anyone and true artists living and working amongst each other. You would have seen families, friends and proffessionals. Who knows, you might even have made some new friends.

But instead, you just drove through, not knowing anything about the community, and then you decide to come on this forum and run your uninformed mouth.

oh, and its Melcher St. not Mulcher st.... but you would have known that driving by it ever day.. right?
By flatcolor1 on 01/29/2009 at 8:08:36
Re: Artists get the shaft

Artists were among the first groups to adapt and reuse the buildings in Fort Point when manufacturing moved out. For decades they prevented blight with a 24 hour presence and created a desirable district. If this is not a fact, why would many of the developers use this as a pitch when they are marketing their property?

 

So you’ve never seen any art in Fort Point? Aside from the Open Studios events there have been numerous remarkable public art pieces that have transformed the Fort Point neighborhood. The artists in Fort Point have a long history of collaborating with the Boston Children’s Museum. Fanciful animals once adorned many areas in the Children’s Museum, made with recycle material by former Fort Point artist Melora Kuhn. Lisa Green Field and Jennifer Moses created an unforgettable public art piece when they covered the Summer Street Bridge with sod, turning the side walks and bridge green, lush and surreal with grass.  

Michael Moss and Claudia Ravisher did another amazing piece when they turned the Summer Street Over Pass into a sound installation singing with poetry and music. All activated by cell phones. Ever take your kid to the Children’s Museum? Those two artists made the Musical Chairs exhibit. My kids can’t get enough of it! That’s joy, right out of Fort Point! 

Public art in the channel, foil flyers glittering in every window of every Fort Point building, old salvaged windows transformed into art by a project headed up by the FPCC and hung along the parking lot of the General Mail Facility, pottery mosaics in the side walks, by Danielle Krcmar, hand crafted benches along Summer Street by Fort Point artists, Christina Lanzl and Jeff Heyne,  the small park on A Street adorned with photos by Hally McGehean, a banner glowing along the General mail facility fence by Tom Wojciechowski.  In 30 plus years there has been plenty of art in the Fort Point neighborhood. So much, much more-I’ve left a lot out-so anyone from Fort Point can jump in and add names and art. Since Goldman Sachs has owned the buildings, they’ve tried very hard to pretend that no artists are in Fort Point, there is too long a history and too much wonderful stuff being made there-now if only the City and the BRA would wake up! 

 If you’ve not seen the art in Fort Point, then you just haven’t opened your eyes.

This is what Boston will be missing if greed is allowed to prevail over culture.   

By TeachArt on 01/29/2009 at 8:09:07
Re: Artists get the shaft
 
By ftptpainter on 01/31/2009 at 12:16:50
Re: Artists get the shaft
 
By ftptpainter on 01/31/2009 at 1:42:01
Re: Artists get the shaft
Southiwontgo demands that the reporter "get the facts straight" and then mistates nearly every fact. This one calls out for a clarification: "most of the panel that came up with the landmarks district was composed of artists, with only one developer - the artists got their way all the way, and the mayor supported the landmarking" First of all, of 4 community reps on the study committee and 5 additional commissioners on the committee drafting guidelines, only one member was an artist. The other 3 community reps were one architect, a retail business owner in the district and lastly, a director of a Boston-based non-profit (unrelated to the arts). Second, the artists did not "get there way" with the landmarking. No Fort Point artists or arts organizations weighed in with any particular position over the multi-year process with respect to the district other than registering strong support for protecting the integrity of the historic wharf buildings. The only fact that Southiwontgo gets right is that Mayor Menino supported the Landmark designation. Many members of the arts community have registered public appreciation for his support, and more appreciation for his support (and City Council support) will certainly be forthcoming in weeks and months ahead.
By ftpointer on 02/04/2009 at 8:44:46

THE BEST 2009
Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY TED SIEFER
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   CITY HALL WRITES ITS OWN REPORT CARD  |  March 04, 2009
    Seeing through transparency
  •   ARTISTS GET THE SHAFT  |  February 02, 2009
    The city gives Fort Point's creative residents the finger
  •   DIANNE'S SPECIAL DEAL  |  October 29, 2008
    State Senator Dianne Wilkerson already has amassed a list of embarrassing political pratfalls. The Phoenix uncovers two more situations that should cause concern on the cusp of the election.

 See all articles by: TED SIEFER

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group