Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
Books  |  Dance  |  Museum And Gallery  |  Theater

Doodle bugs

Brushes with greatness
By NINA MACLAUGHLIN  |  January 2, 2008

Every teen mag worth its weight in heartthrobs can tell you what your notebook doodlings reveal about your personality — arrows equal aggression; boxes, self-centeredness; eyes, a wish to be alluring, and so on. Through January 15, an exhibit titled “The Writer’s Brush,” at the Pierre Menard Gallery in Harvard Square, offers visitors a chance to analyze the images — not the words — that were sketched, painted, inked, etched, and doodled by some 120 writers. The works featured in the show (which is running in conjunction with the publication of a book by the same name by Donald Friedman), aren’t, for the most part, notebook scribblings, but accomplished paintings and drawings — some consistent with the writers’ written work, some quite at odds.

Of course, e.e. cummings — sensual lower-case love poet — paints swirling images of naked women; Jazz ($12,500) is a portrait of a pregnant woman in full swoon. Annie Proulx, chronicler of lonely, sparse, and unforgiving geographies and characters, paints exactly as one would imagine: watercolors of mountain ranges, ripped out of a notebook. Naturalist Annie Dillard uses ink and slate-blue watercolor to do a small portrait of a cottage. Bukowski, that bawdy sod, draws D.H. Lawrence pissing in a urinal with Buk himself hidden in the stall. And Victor Hugo’s tiny, soot-colored cityscape, Paysage ($85,000), seems the perfect home for urchins. Work by Borges and Tennessee Williams (a hybrid beast, and two naked men, respectively), echo both men’s writings and lives.

Other works are less consistent with the writer’s written oeuvre. If someone were to say that J.P. Donleavy, author of the naughty Ginger Man, dabbled in the visual arts, I’d picture buxom women, pint glasses, randy gentlemen — not a purple, egg-shaped bird in Florida–esque pastels. And from poet Louise Glück, whose lines often explore the dissolution of love, I’d expect more fraught visual interiors; her still life — roses, a fork, a spoon, and pear — is all tranquility.

It’s fair to say that Elizabeth Bishop was a better poet than she was a painter. Coxcombes for Oscar ($25,000) is a one-dimensional pastel of red flowers in a vase on a table. Beat poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti’s much-copied portrait, Freud, is, looked at one way, a profile of the man with beard and bleeding Oedipus eyes; looked another, it’s the torso of a naked woman.

As John Updike writes in an essay in The Writer’s Brush (Mid-List Press, 480 pages, $40): “No wonder writers, so many of them, have drawn and painted; the tools are allied, the impulse is one.”

  Topics: Museum And Gallery , Louise Gluck , Elizabeth Bishop , Victor Hugo ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   PARLOR SALON  |  July 16, 2008
    Spreading the words in Salem
  •   EXTE: HAIR EXTENSIONS  |  July 16, 2008
    Creepy and bizarro hair-raising horror
  •   MY FATHER MY LORD  |  June 25, 2008
    Hushed, dun-colored, and beautifully shot
  •   CONFESSIONS OF AN EDITOR  |  June 20, 2008
    DeWitt Henry's candid new collection of essays meditates on manhood
  •   A JIHAD FOR LOVE  |  June 25, 2008
    Potent subject matter overshadowed by special effects

 See all articles by: NINA MACLAUGHLIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in Museum And Gallery:
Friday, August 22, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
StuffAtNight Latest:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group