Sign up for Friends With Benefits
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:16 AM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

Monkey see, monkey do

pages: 1 | 2
9/12/2006 6:20:26 PM

“LA VIE D’UN CHIEN:” John Harden’s short film succeeds as raucous comedy, as a cinéma-vérité send-up, and as an homage to human libido and canine sensitivity.
Not every serving in “Going Ape” tastes like dessert. In John Harden’s 13-minute black-and-white film “La vie d’un chien” (“The Life of a Dog”), a young scientist discovers a serum that temporarily allows people to assume canine form. Experimenting first on himself, the protagonist consummates his love for his pet Pekingese, Sylvie, making her man’s best friend in a whole new way. When he shares the formula of his discovery over the Internet, groups of otherwise decorous citizens take to the streets at night to run in packs, sniff under one another’s tails, hump, and chase cars. The authorities, of course, are alarmed, and the scientist is made to come up with an antidote, but the one he creates locks people into their doggy bodies. In the closing moments, Sylvie and our protagonist as mutt disappear into the darkness of a Paris street. Done in the style of a Ken Burns documentary with voiceovers and photo stills, “La vie d’un chien” succeeds at multiple levels — as raucous comedy, as a send-up of cinéma-vérité, and as an homage to both human libido and canine sensitivity.

The same can’t be said of the two other films, Mary Kenny’s humorless and didactic animations, “The Hunt” and “Death Down Under.” Both are less than four minutes long and done in the flatfooted style of Gumby. In one, an Eskimo seal hunter gets eaten by a polar bear; in the other, an aboriginal bird hunter gets eaten by a crocodile. And there’s about that much suspense. Maybe I’m just deaf and blind to an æsthetic that prizes technical naïveté and heavy doses of message bearing. (The seal hunter has just slaughtered his prey when the polar bear shows up; the bird hunter has just downed a heron when the croc enacts nature’s revenge.)

Henry Horenstein is among the last unflinching Romantics working in photography, and his inclusion in “Going Ape” is one of the quiet highlights of the show. Ten platinum prints from his 1995-’99 “Aquatics” series grace the second-floor gallery, and as often as I’ve seen them over the years they continue to enchant with their orchestrated marriage of dreaminess and precision. In one, the graceful tail of a beluga whale undulates vertically in cloudy water; in another, the misty face of a harbor seal pokes bashfully into the camera’s focus. In Texas Map Turtle we see the entire creature from its underside as it clamors with its pointed nose to the water’s surface for air. And it’s not just the sepia tones of his images or the measured balance of his compositional style that gives Horenstein’s photos their Old World, 19th-century appeal. His photography is rooted in the medium’s origins: painting. Every detail — air bubble, whisker, play of light — reflects the artist’s engaged decision making. If the emotional range is limited (a good-humored eeriness prevails), candor and harmony and charm still make his work indelible.

‘Going Ape: Confronting Animals In Contemporary Art’ | DeCordova Museum and Sculpture Park | 51 Sandy Pond Road, Lincoln | Through January 7



ADVERTISEMENT




pages: 1 | 2
  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




Response to the article "Monkey See, Monkey Do” The question of what defines contemporary art is vast and varied as the artwork one views while walking Newbury Street. Art as with any “product” is about marketing, and how one can create an audience and profit from it. The role of art has changed through history as the advancement of technology offered us more freedom to explore. Contemporary Art shows us ourselves and what we learn from that experience. For example, one museum shows “The Art of Football” the show would follow the history of how fabric and materials have change the look of football apparel. In another museum we have a show called “The Art of the Body” You have a room with a single painting of a nude figure done in the 16th century next to it is a full length mirror, to enter the show you have to disrobe and stand in front of the mirror and look at yourself, as you look at yourself and the figure in the painting you begin to see the relationship between today and the past and how much or how little has changed. Ask the question, which museum will generate more ticket sales and secondary sales? That I believe is how larger shows are conceptualized. In closing, the role that contemporary museums play in contemporary society is one that can and will be debated for sometime. Life has many sides and not all are witty and funny. Contemporary Museums should show us those sides but also show us issues facing ourselves and society. Have museums become places of entertainment, to walk around, have a drink, buy a t-shirt and leave rather than institutions of learning? The balance between commerce & profitability against dialog on social issues or issues that face contemporary art should play a more vital role in the concept of future shows and the role that museums can play in society today.

POSTED BY Time Fades Away AT 09/21/06 1:58 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group