Sign up for the Phoenix Newsletter
Sign up for the Phoenix Newsletter
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Sunday, August 20, 2006 9:27 PM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

The guns of Boston

pages: 1 | 2 | 3
7/6/2006 12:07:06 PM

So one way to curtail demand is to intensify the downsides of illegal gun-ownership, in any number of ways. But attempts to increase liability — more arrests for gun possession, for instance — have failed to change behavior. That’s because they fail to address the actual choices and motivations of two distinct groups of people carrying guns in Boston’s crime-riddled neighborhoods.

One group carries them to hurt and intimidate people. To their way of thinking, they are making a rational choice: not only is it much easier to hurt or kill with a handgun than with a knife or other weapon, but it also makes it much less likely that you’ll get caught.

Those in the second group carry guns to protect themselves against the first; again, from their perspective it’s not an unreasonable decision. As a Phoenix analysis of shootings in the past two months shows, if you live in Boston’s troubled areas, you are never far from where someone has been recently shot — and thus, from someone who shoots people. And you’re at risk of incurring their wrath, especially if you are involved in drugs, gangs, theft, or general mischief.

Both groups, then, have determined that the value of carrying a gun outweighs the risk of spending six months in jail for weapons possession.

There is yet another way to reduce demand, however. As the Phoenix has repeatedly argued, police should be more aggressive in arresting and punishing those who shoot people. In the past two-and-a-half years, 122 people have been shot to death in Boston. Only 28 arrests have been made for those murders, or 23 percent. Of those, only two alleged killers have gone to trial: one was convicted, and one acquitted. Of more than 800 non-fatal shootings during that time, the arrest-rate percentage remains in the low single digits.


ADVERTISEMENT



One way to break the cycle and convince people to give up their guns, is to unilaterally disarm the truly violent criminals — by locking them away, not merely for possession but for shooting. Yet there has been no sign of improvement in this regard. Not surprisingly, then, the level of gun violence continues to rise.

It’s going to be one hell of a summer. 

On the Web
National Youth Gang Center: //www.iir.com/nygc/#National%20Youth%20Gang%20Center


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




You wrote that illegal buyers would favor the, "hot-selling Sig Sauer Mosquito, with adjustable sites and sliding ambidextrous safety — perfect for the southpaw gangbanger." Maybe you're not too familiar with guns and shouldn't really be writing about them. The Mosquito is a .22 rimfire target pistol, too big to conceal easily and at the bottom of the power scale of handguns.

POSTED BY bigiron AT 07/11/06 9:48 PM

>> So one way to curtail demand is to intensify the downsides of illegal gun-ownership, in any number of ways. But attempts to increase liability — more arrests for gun possession, for instance — have failed to change behavior. So it sounds like you believe in the law of supply and demand. Here's an idea- increase the supply of guns to law abiding residents so that they can protect themselves, decrease the threats of being raked through the muck for criminal acts such as shooting a home invader or burglar looking for an illegal gun. How many of the guns used in violence as mentioned in your article were owned legally? How many legal guns would be stolen if burglar knew the risk of getting shot dead while trespassing in the middle of the night in someones home was over 50%? How would you feel about having more police protection available to patrol your community because legal law abiding citizens weren't forced to telephone them and wait for action, but could actually help make their neighborhoods safer by removing a criminal from the streets? The way I see it, this experiment in gun legislation is a failure, and instead of looking at the evidence- that these gun crimes are not committed using legally registered guns by legal gun owners, people look at the roundabout arguement- but a legal gun is one that can be snatched. The real problem is violence. If someone wants to be violent, the tool they have at hand is almost immaterial. We need to either keep people from desiring to be violent or remove the violent people. Gun control not only misses the point completely, it is a waste of resources and makes the problem worse.

POSTED BY OCP AT 07/14/06 2:40 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS

Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group