The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

The cost of torture

Solitary Confinement Bill Hearing
By LANCE TAPLEY  |  February 25, 2010

In the end, whether mass solitary confinement continues at the Maine State Prison supermax may come down to an issue of money rather than right or wrong. And resolving that issue may come down to whether the state wants to pay more now to pay less in the long term.

Psychiatrists, religious leaders, human-rights activists, former prisoners, and many others showed up in force at a nine-hour legislative hearing on February 17 to urge passage of a bill to restrict the Warren prison’s extensive use of solitary. Organized by the Maine Civil Liberties Union, LD 1611’s proponents told the Criminal Justice Committee that prolonged solitary confinement was a form of torture. Experts testified to overwhelming medical evidence that supermax isolation tends to drive prisoners mad — especially, those who are already mentally unstable.

The medical evidence was not disputed by the Department of Corrections. Commissioner Martin Magnusson, however, said his department “does not have the housing or staff” to treat the mentally ill prisoners who would not be allowed to be put in the supermax if the bill became law. Magnusson said that “almost every person” in the Special Management Unit, the 132-man supermax, has a “serious mental illness” under the bill’s definition, though he thought the definition was too broad.

Dealing with these inmates less restrictively, he said, would cost taxpayers more than $11 million a year at a time of budgetary difficulty for the state. The nonpartisan legislative Office of Fiscal and Program Review, however, has not yet calculated how much the bill would cost the state.

LD 1611, sponsored by Representative James Schatz (D-Blue Hill), a Criminal Justice committee member, would ban placing seriously mentally ill inmates in solitary, restrict keeping prisoners there to 45 days (with some exceptions), reduce the use of physical restraints, and set up a placement appeals process.

Virtually all of the bill’s opponents were Corrections employees. Many argued that limiting the ability of guards to keep inmates in the supermax would make their jobs more dangerous.

But Boston psychiatrist Stuart Grassian, a national expert on solitary confinement, testified that not driving prisoners insane makes a prison safer than a supermax does — and therefore cheaper, since controlling violent prisoners is expensive. Other testimony noted that labor-intensive supermax incarceration as a rule costs two or three times the cost of regular imprisonment.

Janis Petzel, president of the Maine Association of Psychiatric Physicians, testified about her experience with an alternative: “I thought if we got rid of solitary and restraints in mental hospitals we couldn’t handle patients, but I was wrong.” Both Petzel and Grassian said disruptive individuals could be calmed within a brief period — often minutes or hours. The supermax sometimes imprisons men for months or years.

A University of Southern Maine political science professor, Richard Maiman, suggested Maine could learn from Mississippi, which — facing lawsuits — drastically reduced the number of supermax inmates as it reduced supermax “serious incidents” by 70 percent as a result of relaxing restrictions on prisoners.

Representative Veronica Magnan (D-Stockton Springs) responded: “I don’t care about Mississippi.”

Many committee members made statements strongly suggesting they were in favor of the department status quo. Several members have worked or still work in law enforcement or corrections. The bill’s supporters expect a more favorable reception on the House and Senate floors. Leaders of the majority Democrats are cosponsors.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Maine tortures women, too, A ‘moral victory’ against supermax torture, Radical night out in Portland, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Health and Fitness, Criminal Sentencing and Punishment, Headlines,  More more >
| More


ARTICLES BY LANCE TAPLEY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MICHAEL JAMES SENT BACK TO PRISON  |  April 16, 2014
    The hearing’s topic was whether James’s “antisocial personality disorder” was enough of a mental disease to keep him from being sent to prison.
  •   LOCKING UP THE MENTALLY ILL  |  April 03, 2014
    The merger of the prison and mental-health systems continues
  •   WHERE ARE THE LEADERS ON CLIMATE CHANGE?  |  March 20, 2014
    The conference was held in March despite the risk of a snowstorm because its organizers wanted “to reach the Legislature while it’s in session,” co-coordinator Fred Horch said.
  •   ANATOMY OF A RIP-OFF, PART II  |  March 06, 2014
    Imagine if state government gave out millions of dollars a year to fat-cat financiers, big banks,  and speculative ventures without monitoring how the money is spent — basically, giving it to whoever walks in the door as long as they flash a few credentials.
  •   ANATOMY OF A TAXPAYER RIP-OFF  |  February 19, 2014
    To try to restore several hundred mill jobs to the historic paper-making North Country towns of Millinocket and East Millinocket, Maine’s politicians, in a bipartisan manner, have given away and are planning to give away millions of taxpayer dollars to various corporate interests, including big, out-of-state banks.

 See all articles by: LANCE TAPLEY



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2014 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group