The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Bus stopped?

The iconic campaign bus is no longer full of newspaper reporters writing for the folks back home. Are the political-junkie Web sites filling the void?
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  January 11, 2012

main_PolRick_480
THE GREAT GAME of covering presidential hopefuls like Rick Santorum (above) has changed profoundly, as strapped local papers have stopped sending their own reporters on the campaign trail — and political niche reporters take their places.

The media mob will have high-tailed it out of New Hampshire by the time you read this. Most will have returned to their hometown newsrooms for a break before parachuting into South Carolina, to see if Mitt Romney can translate his 17-point win into a potentially deal-clinching victory on January 21. The shock troops of the chattering and scribbling classes, however — the handfuls of beat reporters permanently assigned to the campaign trail or to specific candidates — will push on without respite. As they always do.

The great game of covering the egomaniacs who seek the White House seems — on the surface at least — untouched by time. Campaign caravans still disgorge their cargo of bleary-eyed reporters at pre-packaged political events, in a routine immortalized by Timothy Crouse 40 years ago in his iconic study of the campaign trail, The Boys on the Bus. True, the reporters on board are as apt to be girls as boys now; they file from their laptops rather than waiting to get to a typewriter and Telex; and the godsend of smart-phone apps has diminished the grueling boredom of the ride.

Of course, there has been an evolution in political coverage, triggered by the digitization of the news business in which every nanosecond represents yet another news cycle. But something else has changed: the structure of the media business.

In the past, most of the journalists on the campaign bus wrote for local newspapers — small, medium, and large publications from all over the country — that sent their own reporters to cover the candidates.

That practice has sharply diminished, just since the 2008 primaries, in large part due to the economic realities of the industry. Just as newspapers have been forced to close overseas and Washington bureaus, they have trimmed back on their on-the-ground campaign coverage — relying on wire-service reporting, and columnists commenting on what they see and read from afar.

At the same time, there is a huge increase in journalists on the campaign trail covering the election for national, political-niche media. That includes Politico, National Journal, Huffington Post, Yahoo! Politics, Fox News, MSNBC, Real Clear Politics, TPM, Slate, Salon, American Spectator, and Daily Caller.

Instead of the general readership of daily newspapers, these outlets target an audience of political junkies.

Some suspect that the result has been an increased focus on so-called process stories— obsessing over the internal workings and strategies of a campaign, rather than the candidate and the issues.

Others are less leery — some even suggesting that coverage is improving thanks to the fierce competition among these nationally read journalists. But nobody thinks it's going back to the way it was.

main2_PolBus_220
CUTBACKS

Curtis Wilkie was on his first presidential campaign, reporting for two Wilmington, Delaware, papers, when Crouse immortalized him in The Boys on the Bus. Wilkie, later a Boston Globe reporter and now the Overby Fellow and Kelly G. Cook Chair of Journalism at the University of Mississippi, can still run through a mental checklist of reporters on that 1972 bus; it included writers for dailies in Chicago, Washington, Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia, Miami, Dallas, San Jose, San Diego, Los Angeles, Seattle, Denver, Minneapolis, and St. Louis — in many cases, with more than one from each city.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Saner than the GOP: The Salem Presidential Debate, Mitt's Charlie Card, Romney has capitulated utterly to the gun fetishists — as the body count keeps rising, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Politics, Election 2012
| More

[ 05/29 ]   Brad Hooper  @ Andy's Old Port Pub
[ 05/29 ]   karaoke with DJ Ponyfarm  @ Slainte
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FROM THE PENITENTIARY TO THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE, IT’S OUR ANNUAL MEMORIAL DAY ROAST OF MASSACHUSETTS POLS  |  May 25, 2012
    Welcome to the fourth annual Boston Phoenix Memorial Day Roast of Massachusetts politicians! I love looking around the room every year, seeing so many familiar faces of elected officials.
  •   A MORE PERFECT UNION  |  May 18, 2012
    People will surely debate for years to come whether President Barack Obama's self-described "evolution" on universal, legal, same-sex marriage caused, or simply reflected, a turning point on the issue in the United States.
  •   MITT & THE GOP BOYS’ CLUB  |  May 10, 2012
    Last week, Barack Obama's re-election campaign launched a Web slide show, "The Life of Julia," depicting a woman helped throughout her years by Obama policies, and warning that — if elected — Mitt Romney would undo all of them.
  •   COULD THE BAY STATE’S RON PAUL-LOVING DELEGATES RUIN ROMNEY’S CORONATION?  |  May 02, 2012
    Saturday was an embarrassment of epic proportions for Mitt Romney and the Massachusetts Republican Party — an organization that, as I've chronicled in recent months, is essentially an extension of the Romney machine.
  •   PRESCRIPTION POTHOLE  |  April 25, 2012
    It seems strange to say that politicians lack the courage to pass a bill that's favored by the vast majority of their constituents. But that's where Massachusetts stands on its long, strange trip to legalize distribution of medically prescribed marijuana.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2012 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group