The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Best2012Vote-1000x50

Trying out an anti-demonstration ‘sonic cannon’

Non-lethal weapons
By JEFF INGLIS  |  July 16, 2008

The Maine Marine Patrol is considering purchasing a “sonic cannon” capable of broadcasting earsplitting, “disorienting” sounds, like those that have been used to break up peaceful demonstrations in public spaces in Iraq and the country of Georgia.

The device, called a “long-range acoustic device” (LRAD), is described by its manufacturer, the California-based American Technology Corporation, as having the ability to emit an “attention-getting and highly irritating tone for behavior modification.” (The company’s Web site helpfully adds that the device, which costs roughly $20,000, is two feet in diameter, and weighs 60 pounds, has been used “in combat since December 2003.”)

A demonstration model on loan from the manufacturer was tested in Maine over the July 4 holiday weekend by Marine Patrol officers interested in another aspect of the device: its capability to broadcast highly directed sound that can reach people as far as a mile away — for example to communicate with a boat approaching a security zone, according to Marine Patrol Major John Fetterman.

That was one of the intents of the device when it was invented for the US military in response to the failure of a security zone to protect the USS Cole from a suicide-bomber’s attack in a Yemeni port in 2000. That attack killed 17 sailors.

But it wasn’t the LRAD’s only purpose, nor the most worrisome to those who might be more inclined to peaceful assemblies than attacks on warships. The manufacturer’s Web site touts another “feature” of the LRAD — its “warning” sound. That tone can be as loud as 151 decibels, which is enough to cause permanent hearing damage to a person as far as 1000 feet away after just a few seconds of exposure. So if a Marine Patrol officer even accidentally switched the device over to “warning” mode from its more benign “communication” mode, it could literally and permanently deafen anyone in its line of fire.

According to news reports, the warning tones from LRADs, which can be mounted on trucks as well as boats, have been used against civilians by Iraqi police and US troops in Iraq over the past few years, and were used in November 2007 by police in Tblisi, Georgia, to disperse an anti-government rally. (The New York Police Department deployed at least one LRAD near a demonstration outside the Republican National Convention in September 2004, but didn’t use the warning tone.)

The most-often touted “success” of the device’s warning tone was in defense of a Carnival Cruise Lines cruise ship attacked by pirates firing assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades off the coast of Somalia in 2005. While it did repel the attack, one of the two men who used the device against the pirates says he has lost some of his hearing as a result.

But perhaps we can take some comfort in Fetterman’s remark that if the Marine Patrol did buy an LRAD, it would probably buy “only one” and move it from boat to boat as needed. And he says the agency is “only looking at it for communications,” not for crowd-dispersal purposes.

On the Web
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/11/georgia-police-.html
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/11/acoustic-weapon.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj1hGarg8lk
http://flickr.com/photos/16241099@N00/379261/

Related: Letters to the Portland editor: April 24,2009, The Big Hurt: Neglected press-release roundup, Up the Yangtze, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Culture and Lifestyle, U.S. Armed Forces, Police,  More more >
| More

[ 02/15 ]   Freya + Letter to the Exiles  @ Port City Music Hall
[ 02/15 ]   Trouble is My Business  @ Portland Stage Company
ARTICLES BY JEFF INGLIS
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   CAMP CLOSES; CURFEW PASSES; ACTIVISM CONTINUES  |  February 15, 2012
    Let's just say it: The first phase of OccupyMaine ended with a fizzle, not a bang. The showing at Friday's 10 pm deadline for Occupiers to be out of Lincoln Park was poor.
  •   AS ENCAMPMENT FADES, PROTEST SHIFTS BACK TO CORE ISSUES  |  February 08, 2012
    Even as Portland city officials continue to pressure OccupyMaine to leave Lincoln Park, they have done the Occupation a great favor, perhaps unintentionally.
  •   QUESTION AUTHORITY  |  February 08, 2012
    Maine journalists appear to disbelieve their own eyes, decline to do their own research, and prefer to quote officials instead of relying on independent knowledge and experience.
  •   CITIZENS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT OCCUPY ENCAMPMENT  |  February 01, 2012
    As OccupyMaine's request to stay in Lincoln Park is considered by a Maine judge, it appears the Portland City Council's decisions (which the judge is reviewing) were based more on individual councilors' views and less on constituent complaints than elected officials have let on.
  •   SIGN CONUNDRUM CONTINUES; MONUMENTS 'JOIN' MOVEMENT  |  January 25, 2012
    The mystery of where OccupyMaine's signs went is partially solved: it turns out their removal was witnessed — and by a police officer!

 See all articles by: JEFF INGLIS



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2012 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group