The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

The briefly indecent Boston Globe

Freedom watch
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  March 19, 2008

080321_globe_main

“Freedom Watch” this past week criticized newspapers, which are not regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, for not printing expletives, even when the naughty words are central to the stories being reported. It was therefore startling to see the Boston Globe’s online edition publish a Reuters wire-service article on Monday, March 17, containing the words “fuck” and “shit.” That article, on the Supreme Court’s decision to review the constitutionality of FCC rules banning “fleeting expletives” (unexpected utterances on live broadcasts that make it past the bleepers), used the words at issue in the court case, even though previous Globe stories had not.

For a fleeting moment, it appeared as if the Globe style guru had read our past week’s column, “Newspapers Censor Bono’s ‘Fucking’ Gaffe,” and changed the paper’s policy. Perhaps the Globe realized that reporting the actual words when germane to the story serves the public interest. But Tuesday morning’s print edition proved that was not the case. Instead, the Reuters article was replaced with a Globe Wire Services story that referred to “expletives” and “profanity” without spelling out the four-letter words. By then the unexpurgated Reuters version was accessible only by digging deep into boston.com’s search function. Did the Globe have different policies for its online version and its print edition?

Martin Baron, the paper’s editor, told “Freedom Watch” that “We have the same standards, but apparently there was a lapse at boston.com. Even though our policy is not to your liking, your note serves as motivation to tighten procedures.”

Related: Satellite of love, Plain talk, Indie dependents, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Swearing and Invective, U.S. Federal Communications Commission, Martin Baron
| More

ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   TAKING THE PLEDGE IN BROOKLINE  |  September 13, 2011
    Freedom Watch
  •   A LIBERTARIAN'S VIEW OF THE BARSTOOL/BRADY CHILD-PORN FIASCO  |  August 25, 2011
    Sophisticated First Amendment scholars, lawyers, and media commentators, all of whom are strongly free-speech/free-press supporters, were critical of Coakley for allegedly engaging in a legal bluff — the veiled threat of possible prosecution under the state's child-porn statute — to convince Portnoy to remove the offending and exploitative image from his site.
  •   HOW THE ARROYO JURY GOT IT RIGHT  |  August 25, 2011
    Rarely has a Boston jury had to suffer as much ridicule as the 12 citizens who acquitted former Boston firefighter Albert Arroyo of pension fraud.
  •   2011 MUZZLE AWARDS: CAMPUS EDITION  |  June 29, 2011
    Law school is not known for being fun, so some professors spice instruction with far-fetched hypotheticals. To some students at Widener University School of Law in Wilmington, Delaware, one longtime criminal-law prof's hypos went too far.  
  •   CURBING CORRUPTION WITH A CATCH-ALL  |  June 24, 2011
    Sal DiMasi is no saint, but that doesn't mean he's a criminal. His behavior makes us grimace, but it simply doesn't amount to a state or federal felony.

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2012 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group